- Posts
- 499
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Joined
- 7 May 2005
Yo
I'm going to suggest a compromise with the debate over the 200fps advantage.
____________________________________________________
Rule:
125fps is the cap, a clan leader can ask the other team leader, in the pre-game, to allow unlimited fps cap.
____________________________________________________
In my opinion, 200fps is a game swinging advantage for jet-packs. But, yes there is a but, I'd rather people had more freedom and can use the equipment they buy, to it's full potential.
Thoughts?
Please keep replies concise and on topic.
LUMPERNATOR :D
Archaea
- Donors
- Movie Donator
- Posts
- 291
- Location
- Oslo, Norway
- Joined
- 6 May 2005
No, that is a bad idea. Cap or don't cap.
#archaea @ irc.quakenet.org
- Donors
- Posts
- 86
- Location
- Wales, United Kingdom
- Joined
- 8 May 2005
Why does there need to be a comprise? just make a decision on it and be done with it.
old people
- Admins
- Provider & Webmaster
- Posts
- 490
- Location
- Finland
- Joined
- 1 May 2009
If two teams want to play without a cap, I don't see why shouldn't admins let them.
- Posts
- 246
- Location
- Osaka, Japan
- Joined
- 6 May 2005
set the fps limit somewhere where game is smooth and you dont experience mouse bug then it's a compromise althought i like 200 fps a lot cause you can actually bring full potential out of this game.
- Donors
- Major Server Funder
- Posts
- 614
- Location
- Wiener Neudorf, Austria
- Joined
- 16 April 2008
Stop the discussion ppl voted its 125 .. END OF IT ! ... we know there is still ppl that want 200 fps some ppl want 20 fps like multi .. but vote said 125 sao let it go ffs !
onFire
- Posts
- 578
- Location
- Mannheim, Germany
- Joined
- 3 November 2009
I don't really care whether you allow 200 fps or not. BUT make a final decision on it AND fucking stick to it troughout the whole season.
If you allow captains to decide for each match you will have massive troll fights and ppl raging all around instead of readying up.
- Posts
- 499
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Joined
- 7 May 2005
The important factor is that only CLAN LEADERS can be involved in the pre-game discussion.
Do you think mercsok always creates massive troll fights? really???
onFire
- Posts
- 578
- Location
- Mannheim, Germany
- Joined
- 3 November 2009
Actually, it did. Really. But the /mercsok option is necessary, the /allow200fps isn't.
- Posts
- 499
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Joined
- 7 May 2005
I thought mercsok was always more of a problem solver tbf
Good point. We can always do some more than what's necessary, to cater for a lot of opinions is often a good idea imo
- Donors
- Posts
- 86
- Location
- Wales, United Kingdom
- Joined
- 8 May 2005
So what happens when one group wants to have 200fps active for the match and the over group doesn't?
- Posts
- 499
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Joined
- 7 May 2005
Hmm ok, I thought it was quite clear. The above match would be capped at 125fps, because both CLs need to agree.
Damage Networks
- Posts
- 38
- Location
- Gorgeshire, United States
- Joined
- 11 October 2006
is fps_max capped or not? I don't care either way I just wanna be able to tell my dudes what's up
- Posts
- 499
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Joined
- 7 May 2005
I'm gonna sort out the rules asap, it will 95% be capped.
">
- Gather Moderators
- NS1 Gather Mod
- Posts
- 145
- Location
- 123, Russian Federation
- Joined
- 8 October 2005
hmm is a cap worth or not?
Ofc it is a target of a league to give every player the same possibilities. I mean if someone has a shitpc he is not able to get these 200fps while another one with a goodpc could reach these 200fps easily. The one with the 200 fps has a big advantage at least as marines because he is effectively shooting faster.
Now we are discussing if we should cap these fps because the one with the shitpc could not get this advantage.
And I agree it sounds unfair if someone just shoots slower because his pc is shit. But isn't it also unfair that the one with the shitpc gets fps drops to 21 if a lerk spores? We have to fix this. Jiriki has to write a plugin so everyones fps drop to 21 if a lerk spores on the map!
Then again a good situated player uses a 4000dpi PRO MOUSE while a bad situated player just can afford a 2$ Mouse with 400dpi. We have to limit the maximum dpi with a plugin! That is just not fair that he is using more dpis! But then again we cannot change the shape of the mouse. We are fucked.
Exertus
- Posts
- 48
- Location
- Siilinjärvi, Finland
- Joined
- 15 May 2005
Logical solution: something breaks the game -> block it.
- Posts
- 499
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Joined
- 7 May 2005
'AlmatyKZ'Now we are discussing if we should cap these fps because the one with the shitpc could not get this advantage.
No.
It's to retain game balance with JPs.
Try again :)
- Donors
- Major Server Funder
- Posts
- 614
- Location
- Wiener Neudorf, Austria
- Joined
- 16 April 2008
What is the problem here ppl? ..
Vote said 125 fps cap . so implement the cap there ! (although i still think it is a joke)
And to please lump .. its not a bad idea to give ppl the choice but i would say if u implement a 200 fps possibility i d say make it /freefps and not just rise the fps too 200 so that everyone can play what he wants to play .. further id say it should require every single one playing that game to write /freefps before fpscap is removed ! just to make sure that there is no abuse by one troll per team fucking with the rest !
Have a good one ppl ! Merry Christmas !
old people
- Admins
- Provider & Webmaster
- Posts
- 490
- Location
- Finland
- Joined
- 1 May 2009
Oh no, you didn't just trigger the FPS bomb. Quick take cover.