Maximum FPS

lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
21 September 2010 - 17:32 EDT
#1
Yo

I'm going to suggest a compromise with the debate over the 200fps advantage.
____________________________________________________
Rule:

125fps is the cap, a clan leader can ask the other team leader, in the pre-game, to allow unlimited fps cap.
____________________________________________________

In my opinion, 200fps is a game swinging advantage for jet-packs. But, yes there is a but, I'd rather people had more freedom and can use the equipment they buy, to it's full potential.

Thoughts?

Please keep replies concise and on topic.

LUMPERNATOR :D
Fana
Noavatar
Archaea
Donors
Movie Donator
Posts
291
Location
Oslo, Norway
Joined
6 May 2005
21 September 2010 - 17:50 EDT
#2
No, that is a bad idea. Cap or don't cap.

#archaea @ irc.quakenet.org

d-
174
Donors
Posts
86
Location
Wales, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
8 May 2005
21 September 2010 - 18:10 EDT
#3
Why does there need to be a comprise? just make a decision on it and be done with it.

:3

jiriki
176
old people
Admins
Provider & Webmaster
Posts
490
Location
Oulu, Finland
Joined
1 May 2009
21 September 2010 - 19:15 EDT
#4
If two teams want to play without a cap, I don't see why shouldn't admins let them.
Get to the spaceship!
aA
45
Posts
246
Location
Osaka, Japan
Joined
6 May 2005
24 September 2010 - 17:00 EDT
#5
set the fps limit somewhere where game is smooth and you dont experience mouse bug then it's a compromise althought i like 200 fps a lot cause you can actually bring full potential out of this game.
EisTeeAT
1716
Donors
Major Server Funder
Posts
614
Location
Wiener Neudorf, Austria
Joined
16 April 2008
24 September 2010 - 18:12 EDT
#6
Stop the discussion ppl voted its 125 .. END OF IT ! ... we know there is still ppl that want 200 fps some ppl want 20 fps like multi .. but vote said 125 sao let it go ffs !
blind
Noavatar
onFire
Posts
578
Location
Mannheim, Germany
Joined
3 November 2009
24 September 2010 - 19:01 EDT
#7
I don't really care whether you allow 200 fps or not. BUT make a final decision on it AND fucking stick to it troughout the whole season.

If you allow captains to decide for each match you will have massive troll fights and ppl raging all around instead of readying up.
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
25 September 2010 - 09:13 EDT
#8
The important factor is that only CLAN LEADERS can be involved in the pre-game discussion.

Do you think mercsok always creates massive troll fights? really???
blind
Noavatar
onFire
Posts
578
Location
Mannheim, Germany
Joined
3 November 2009
25 September 2010 - 16:22 EDT
#9
Actually, it did. Really. But the /mercsok option is necessary, the /allow200fps isn't.
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
25 September 2010 - 16:40 EDT
#10
I thought mercsok was always more of a problem solver tbf

Good point. We can always do some more than what's necessary, to cater for a lot of opinions is often a good idea imo
d-
174
Donors
Posts
86
Location
Wales, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
8 May 2005
25 September 2010 - 17:34 EDT
#11
So what happens when one group wants to have 200fps active for the match and the over group doesn't?

:3

lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
25 September 2010 - 17:41 EDT
#12
Hmm ok, I thought it was quite clear. The above match would be capped at 125fps, because both CLs need to agree.
meb
1134
Damage Networks
Posts
38
Location
Gorgeshire, United States of America
Joined
10 October 2006
28 September 2010 - 22:00 EDT
#13
is fps_max capped or not? I don't care either way I just wanna be able to tell my dudes what's up
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
29 September 2010 - 04:46 EDT
#14
I'm gonna sort out the rules asap, it will 95% be capped.
mp3
2168
Posts
5
Location
Germany
Joined
28 July 2010
29 September 2010 - 06:11 EDT
#15
" oh yeah my pc could reach over 9000 fps - fps capped is bullshit "


" ololol, you are all kinda bullshit-idiots - fps is capped at 125 or somthing else i wanna do, because my own pc is capped at 60fps! - cap the stat at 60!! "


i lold
Dr_G
669
">
Gather Moderators
NS1 Gather Mod
Posts
145
Location
123, Afghanistan
Joined
8 October 2005
29 September 2010 - 06:20 EDT
#16
hmm is a cap worth or not?
Ofc it is a target of a league to give every player the same possibilities. I mean if someone has a shitpc he is not able to get these 200fps while another one with a goodpc could reach these 200fps easily. The one with the 200 fps has a big advantage at least as marines because he is effectively shooting faster.
Now we are discussing if we should cap these fps because the one with the shitpc could not get this advantage.
And I agree it sounds unfair if someone just shoots slower because his pc is shit. But isn't it also unfair that the one with the shitpc gets fps drops to 21 if a lerk spores? We have to fix this. Jiriki has to write a plugin so everyones fps drop to 21 if a lerk spores on the map!
Then again a good situated player uses a 4000dpi PRO MOUSE while a bad situated player just can afford a 2$ Mouse with 400dpi. We have to limit the maximum dpi with a plugin! That is just not fair that he is using more dpis! But then again we cannot change the shape of the mouse. We are fucked.
naduli
Noavatar
Exertus
Posts
48
Location
Siilinjärvi, Finland
Joined
15 May 2005
29 September 2010 - 07:46 EDT
#17
Logical solution: something breaks the game -> block it.
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
29 September 2010 - 07:47 EDT
#18
'AlmatyKZ'Now we are discussing if we should cap these fps because the one with the shitpc could not get this advantage.

No.

It's to retain game balance with JPs.

Try again :)
EisTeeAT
1716
Donors
Major Server Funder
Posts
614
Location
Wiener Neudorf, Austria
Joined
16 April 2008
29 September 2010 - 08:10 EDT
#19
What is the problem here ppl? ..

Vote said 125 fps cap . so implement the cap there ! (although i still think it is a joke)

And to please lump .. its not a bad idea to give ppl the choice but i would say if u implement a 200 fps possibility i d say make it /freefps and not just rise the fps too 200 so that everyone can play what he wants to play .. further id say it should require every single one playing that game to write /freefps before fpscap is removed ! just to make sure that there is no abuse by one troll per team fucking with the rest !

Have a good one ppl ! Merry Christmas !
jiriki
176
old people
Admins
Provider & Webmaster
Posts
490
Location
Oulu, Finland
Joined
1 May 2009
29 September 2010 - 08:22 EDT
#20
Oh no, you didn't just trigger the FPS bomb. Quick take cover.
Get to the spaceship!
multi
Noavatar
The Team
Posts
37
Location
Germany
Joined
5 April 2008
29 September 2010 - 08:42 EDT
#21
.
New Reply